Alright, im going to say something (AI Rant) by OOOeyGoooey < Journal

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

I agree completely, It's a toy at worst and a tool for artists at best, it should not be used as a money maker unless you are making stuff like character loras, models ewtc. as part of your patreon/kofi.

Weiss

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

As I understand it, the best AI tools aren't free, they require a subscription. To generate NSFW stuff you need to do so locally and in order to do that you do need quite the beefy PC. Also some AI generators(I wouldn't call them artists myself) use Photoshop or other editing tools to fix small(or sometimes big) mistakes that the AI tool often does so I assume they have to pay for those tools as well.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Weiss

The same could be said of Clip studio which costs me like 250 i think for the EX version, costs of software aside the person is not the one making it, a computer who is learning and further "simplified" by Loras or such whatever they are, is, and again, my main thing is taking away potential money from a true artist thats fine tuned thier craft for years, ive seen people pick AI up all too easy just throwing words, popular ones like "(-) bad anatomy, multiple hands," or stuff they dont want

So yeah, pretty much, no one told them to buy the software, they did it themselves and are having a software make things for them, whoever MADE the software-- maybe? i mean thats pretty cool what it can just generate from basis keywords alone, whoever made these def props, i can kinda- KINDA forgive the art it learns from because it mishmashes stylization and such i guess?

Floofy

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

There's a lot of wording that goes into getting good results from an AI
And if I'm not mistaken you can put existing pictures in to train it further for specific characters too.

It's a tool that you have to know how to use properly to get good results.

End of the day, AI are fundementally unreliable and many are created through unethical means (using pictures scraped from artists without their permissions).
If you do use an AI make sure it's training data is ethically sourced!

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Floofy

You can, yeah, all of this is true and logical with the ethical source only thing, but my main thing is against trying to monetize it, that makes my eye twitch

KokarcaEpicskunk

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

I don't hate AI artwork. I hate people who post it (or paywall it/try to get monetization from it) as their own artwork.

No. You did not make the artwork. You basically "paid" an "artist" to make one for you. Even I myself make AI art sometimes, but none of it is serious, and I don't post any one of them as my own art, and I don't even post them while crediting the AI that made it because it isn't something that I have done that is done by an artist. I'm really sick of seeing AI artwork being posted around this website.

I just hope that we get the same treatment that Pixiv has; having the ability to turn off AI artwork so that you cannot see them. Or people behind IB need to do something about it.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

Edited 1 month, 2 weeks ago by Owner

@ KokarcaEpicskunk

Well, AI artists usually are mandated to keyword it "ai_generated, ai," etc So that SHOULD solve that issue for you unless some people forget, then its just reminding them and hopefully they comply

If not i mean i think you can report them xD so

Etis

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

It is an old "painter vs photographer" all again. Photography is not an art, you only press a button and machine makes a picture for you... But 100 years after, and both found their niches, and no one says that photo can't be an art.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Etis

A photographer has various tools of trade and a person behind it giving effort and angle via leaning thier body or posture to create timeless shots of people places or scenes, i.e, a wonderful sunset, a couple at a marriage then they have to possibly render them into bigger canvases or such if they want to blow it up to really show it off more

Ai art is you litterally press a button and something could be made for you, you could go as simple as like "knotted cock" and suddenly the ai has made a thing or 12 for you, i know thats not the effort of some ai artists ive seen on here, ive noticed a multitude of keywords and + - working, but thats all it is, fine tuning WORDS, props to the ones that also use photoshop maybe to edit out blemishes and stuff maybe too, but still

In typing this, i realize you have some points of value, but there are just some things that cant be ignored, i reitterate that i do not want the mentality to sprout that AI art should be given money, because thats a slippery slope i feel.

Etis

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ OOOeyGoooey

AI itself is a tool of trade. So say it is not is like saying that CNC machine or 3D printer are not tools. Sure, it would do the manual part of the job for you, but explaining to it what exactly do you want from it is a job.

Sure, it takes different set of skills, but it is not a reason to return to manual forging with a hammer.

Sure, you can say to AI "knotted cock", but you also can just get a photo of whatever you have in your window and call it a landscape art.

Drawing is not an art. Drawing is just a craft. Creating something new is an art. And which tool you are using for it does not matter.

In fact, AI in its current form is a very bad tool for that. Because you can't make it draw something entirely new. You can only make it draw character it already knows with anatomy it already knows in a pose it already knows. So... If you are an artist and you are afraid that AI would replace you - you are not an artist. You are just a painter.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Etis

Hmm. That last sentence there though, it invalidates the feelings of artists that have tried hard and come far to see this machine suddenly appear making things that could be well above thier level, some have that fear, im not afraid an ai is going to replace ME im concerned that people will start to have AI try to make money as if they are artists that outright made this themselves, words into a prompt, i mean i just saw a thing that was 40 ish keywords, the negative prompt ones probably able to be copy pasta'd as similar rubric, and dont get me wrong, nice picture but it emphazies the simplicity

You seem to be focusing on the side of the semantics of Ai vs art medium more then really any reason why Ai art should go higher then a Ko-fi monetarily, aside of Loras maybe ive heard which are more difficult to make

And as for the characters and such it already knows, yes, but, my main thing is if the person then is asking for money or deciding they can make commisssion off of this or paywall it

Theres going to be a slippery slope if its indulged, and id honestly like to nip that in the bud

Etis

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ OOOeyGoooey

Those feelings are not new though. There always are Luddites afraid of a new technology taking away their jobs. Are their feelings valid? Yes. Should we appease them? No, we can't stop the progress.

As for asking for money - what is wrong with it? We are paying money to get the product. That's all. If you can not compete - you are not entitled to have those money.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

Edited 1 month, 2 weeks ago by Owner

@ Etis

Your wording of it just seemed poor in taste "If you are an artist and you are afraid that AI would replace you - you are not an artist. You are just a painter."

Pardon i got snippy, Yes, Ai will definitely not be stopped im more then certain, its already gained alot of traction

As for paying for the product? I still stand it shouldnt go beyond Ko-Fi, Ai may be interesting, but it as an insult to digital artists to make it commision, artists that spent years working on things to get where they are, its not going to replace them, lets hope anyway, because AI is ever learning, but i still consider it a slippery slope, so i personally hope it being considered commission stays as it is under inkbunnys rules; and that is that it is not allowed to be done.

And sure, perhaps i have concerns that might be silly, but im entitled to feel as i feel about it, and so are you, differing of opinions or otherwise

Etis

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ OOOeyGoooey

That's the market for you - everyone is free to choose between mass produced and artisan hand-made.

Xienoan

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Etis

"	That's all. If you can not compete - you are not entitled to have those money.

Even the top skill artist will lose in terms of speed to AI. Nor speaking of how many will be beaten by quality. AI "artists" spend some times on composition and technicality to improve final result. But now its machine breaking the sweat on top of huge compilation of stolen art. This is not looking like a fair competition.

Etis

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Xienoan

That's progress for you. You can't be faster than a machine. This is why most products are now made by machines. Is it fair? Yes. Learn to use the new tool, find a niche, or become obsolete.

Also, it is not stolen. Machines learn in the same way as humans do. On examples. Human also can't create something entirely new. Everything you've created is also derived from what you saw. This is just how it works.

Xienoan

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Etis

Yeah, learning so much like a human that without a proper training it can generate images with a bits of signatures at the right bottom corner. AI output degenerates quickly when its fed by AI stuff.

Humans put effort and inspiration while learning, often with a respect and credit to the source. Each going with own experience. Unlike AI big brains which are few in numbers and provides zero credit.

If a real artist wants a full replica of someone's style, lets say to be fully derivative - they still have to put a lot of effort in it. And at the end they wouldn't make original creator obsolete. Contrary to current situation with model training capabilities of AI - you can hijack whatever style and copy and share those settings without a limit - your machine/server will take care of that.

Etis

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Xienoan

Maybe it would surprise you, but humans also need proper education.

Current AI only makes its first baby steps. You are asking too much from it.

Xienoan

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Etis

"	Human also can't create something entirely new

I'd say OOOey's style is something entirely new

Shryke

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ OOOeyGoooey

Also, Photography enjoys copyright protection based on there being a certain creativity involved in blocking the shot, etc (not my opinion, but the background in copyright law). Even a crappy photo snapped without looking down the viewfinder still gets copyright protection.

As of now, AI art does not get such protection because a verbal description of something is not considered creative, therefore cannot be copyrighted, no matter how long it takes to fine tune the prompts (“sweat of the brow doctrine).

SidneyKenson

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Etis

Well, I think the painter vs photographer comparison lacks behind. In photography you more often than not have one chance, and one chance only. You have to anticipate the moment and get your tools in the general direction where you want it, tune settings into acceptable brackets (with raw photography you can still do a lot in post-production, but for example depth of field - determined by the apperture of the lens - is fix baked even into the raw image and you will never get back what is lost in bokeh). Even in settings where you can pose a lot, let's take wedding photography as a prime example. You can pose the switching of the rings for hours on end, but your customer will know, and they will hate this photo, if it isn't just THE moment of switching the rings during the ceremony. You miss that shot or fuck that photo up and you're screwed.

It takes quite some effort to get a photo to look like you as the photographer want it to look: `Which lens do you use? How and where do you place your subject? Do you shoot with natural light or do you use flashes? Do you need reflectors or shadowers? How many flashes and where do you place them? Which type of light formers do you use with each flash?

Today with digital photography and depending on the photo you want to take it is basically a time game, but back in the good old ages of film photography it was even an expensive game.

In AI, if you don't like the result, you feed the outcome back as a negative example, the AI will learn from it, but noone else other than you will know it even existed. You waste time, electric energy for the AI to work and need to rephrase the keywords.

CyrooiKitty

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

I've never heard of artists locking AI art behind a paywall before.
That sounds stupid!
I do see people not tagging AI art properly.
It doesn't annoy me, but it should be tagged ofcourse.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ CyrooiKitty

Not yet for me either at least but i feel its a possibility if the mindset brews enough x.x;;;

Neos8

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ CyrooiKitty

I believe i found at least one before but its crazy that they think its cool.

CandanceTheRunaway

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

Ai has its flaws still in my books but a few of my artist friends use it to draw backgrounds on occasion. But ya i see your frustration on it.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ CandanceTheRunaway

If you reference it, more to you, as i said, theres quirks and nifty bits of style work ive seen i would probably wish to implement into my own art, things ive been looking for but couldnt put to my mind to properly know what i want, that ive tugged up from AI a touch and its improved me abit, i think i have to go a little further to understand some quirks but yeah

Shryke

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

I much prefer RO art! (Real Ooooooooo)

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Shryke

Hee x3

KevinSnowpaw

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

im not a fan of the give me money for my art thing....when it comes to AI

On the other hand it takes more work then some might think.. so if A person is pumping out consistently high quality AI images and it's NOT clearly devivative of another artist like they actualy put some effort into it, sticking a Ko-fi on the post for people who wnat to toss them a few bucks.. not that egregous...

I dont really love it I dont really hate it...im MEH about it.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ KevinSnowpaw

Yeah, i can see the effort that goes into some things, may have eaten my words a little when i saw this one https://inkbunny.net/s/3270881

Definitely seems alot more work, but then i stop to think, its all words, processes, none of the hard work that full artists have to go through, the layers, the effects and such, the only mirror to our work is just the process it takes to find good words, id have to delve deeper with real ai art makers and kinda see to how many hours they spend on things

Its that grey area i feel, like im settled that Kofi is probably okay, but calling it commission, thats like writing a short story as a writer and then the result evolves into a full rendered piece, the phrase a picture says a thousand words is almost litteral here, and its kind of an insult

On the flip side it could be said im insulting Ai makers and thier effort too but idk, thats how i feel, a guy can change his mind but right now im just like, uhhhh

KevinSnowpaw

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ OOOeyGoooey

https://inkbunny.net/s/3203819 this took me a long time to make XD

and yes it was all keywords and processes but you make meny images, each one takes some time, you adjust the prompts to change thingso once you get something thats about what your after then you switch to the img2img tool and regenerate MORE images based on THAT image...then you use the inpaint tool to add in or remove things from the image you want or need to change...I used it to add in some hidden sex toys and remove an extra toe in this picture for example.

It's not the same as a traditional artist no not at all, but it's also not as simple as just pushing some bottons brainlessly and then churning out 30 pics. XD

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ KevinSnowpaw

Thats the point im getting at really, its by no means the same to a actual digital artist and years youve put in

BUT on the vein of my argument youre not really asking for money and you still support artists to draw what an ai cannot do kevy justice in xD

I probably wouldnt care if you did a kofi? more to it too if you make a kofi it has traction and you support an artist

I think i could handle that, if ai art became not a threatening looming aspect but instead gears of returned support, but still, people could need money and maybe a kofi could help afford a bill or such

I hope you know im trying to be open ish about it some heh x3

KevinSnowpaw

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ OOOeyGoooey

I've thought about a Ko-fi since i spend so much on commission work if people want to see more they could support me but at the same time...ive been raised really old school and anything that feels like begging or a hand out gives me the ICK! so... I don't know if I ever could.

YellowSnowlep

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

AI generation isn't art, it's google search hooked up to deep dream and photoshop. It will never replace actual artists, and is currently a tool being used to counterfeit actual art.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ YellowSnowlep

Hence my worry about it growing into being called commission and getting more revenue then it needs, and people possibly like "Oh i could commish this one guy or i get it done by this ai guy that does it 30 times better"

It dosent matter WHO it takes or it it dosent, what matters is it getting any traction, and jipping any random artist who couldve grown from that commission experience, and i just feel a snowball effect, eventually people are going to figure out how to manipulate other artist styles or characters and such or keyword wise

YellowSnowlep

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

Edited 1 month, 2 weeks ago by Owner

@ OOOeyGoooey

That is just a matter of feeding it artists works. Thankfully I found something that AI will never do, tell a story that has any real human depth, humor, and observation. Also it can't do letters at all, so I'm safe as I'm also very big on doing nice lettering.

YellowSnowlep

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ OOOeyGoooey

Also my work is all licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 which means that while someone can put my work into a training data-set as soon as they share anything from that data-set I'm allowed to DMCA the images.

NeoPatamonX

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

More the reason it's important as fans to support our creators to keep the craft alive.

People will support what they want to support, they'll throw their money away on whatever they think it's worth it. I think as long as you have a willing fan base you'll still have your work be appreciated; financially and beyond.

What's going to be interesting is seeing the next generation of creators, and how they navigate growing a fan base... barrier to entry is going to require new skills. As a software developer I'm facing the same thing with development too

Personally, anyone paying someone to curate a prompt is wasting their money; but that's just my own opinion. I rather enjoy the process of getting sketches, socializing ideas, and growing a relationship with people to engage in art -- all of that is lost when all you do is develop a prompt.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

Edited 1 month, 2 weeks ago by Owner

@ NeoPatamonX

Yeah really, i truely do hope it dosent shaft budding artists out of work and people still support the growth of them, forces them a little more into original work / requests probs, which isnt a bad thing but yeah heh xD

And yeah, the human to human interaction is an expereince for sure

And yeah, i settled on okay with Ko-fi tips for AI artists, but past that feels insulting, commish, paywall, substar, or such

MystBunny

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

I'm always going to commission artists because human intuition is an important part of commissioning art. I'm pretty thorough with my descriptions when commissioning something, but I can only describe so much before the artist has to read between the lines and they always seem to nail something I forgot to mention.

Also I will instantly unwatch any AI artist who starts paywalling content. Also keeping in mind that I'm pretty sure an AI artist can't copyright AI artwork, and so it should be open to reposting/editing from paywalls without consequence.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ MystBunny

Yeee, either that or just the brainstorming and evolving an idea x3

True enough actually! suppose thats a little less of worry for that

Link

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

In my opinion AI is fine, as long as you don't post the thing it spits out, neither directly nor edited.

Use the thing it gives you as reference to draw your own thing then it's 100% ok. It's fine to emulate the style, people do that already just looking at other artists they like. It's fine to use it to get variations of the pose you wanna make, make it spit like 10 examples at you and use what looks best for reference.

Also, and this might be a very spicy take, I see no issue with it using scraped art for this, as long as it's all done locally on your own hardware. It's no different than to just hop on E621 and browse for the thing you want, only slightly more convenient as the AI will make something close to what you want without you having to dig through 6000 pages of submissions on E6. Just don't share the results with others.

Again though, this is only ok for as long as it's personal use for references and ideas and not to be posted to any gallery or shared with friends.
And no, if you don't do the stuff I mentioned above you should not be allowed to ask for money for it.

An addendum in regards to posting stuff, I might be ok if an art piece that's otherwise drawn by hand use AI to add a background since backgrounds are mostly generic anyways. But preferably even then you should use the result as a reference rather than just slapping it on and calling it a day.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

Edited 1 month, 2 weeks ago by Owner

@ Link

Yeah, all of what you said, pretty much, though, i lean to the side its fineish to post but like another pal told me it could maaaaaybe use its own dump place that dosent touch IBs popular section or search field that way people can look into it if they want, and while its mostly achieved with blacklisting "ai" some are lazy and dont tag, i guess that you can just slap em with an ai tag and be at peace though as long as they accept it

I only think its fine to post because it might see other artist inspire style growth with aspects an ai art does close to thiers

And yeah, IB AUP allows ai assisted things for commission, like backgrounds or assets, it thankfully does not allow fullon commision

Vexio

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

Personally I'd be pissed if I bought a commission and learned someone used ai to make the commission.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Vexio

And i feel sometimes with the heavy AI influx sometimes people see high tier art now and thier first is like "Ugh ai artist" or something lol

RexSatou

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

funny you mention that actually, I believe someone on here actually posted a pic that was drawn with AI that they bought from someone off Etsy and it looked really bad XD

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ RexSatou

Oh no... xD;

Delquea

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

For me, AI will never replace actual artists. to me all I see is a reference generator XD one of my drawings was referenced from an AI generated image. made things easier since I was stumped on pose ideas.

The issue is people who wanna abuse it as an easy money making scheme and calling it real art when its just generated images.

I am aware of artists who use AI to help with shading their already existing art and such but thats just the extent I seen it as so far.

RexSatou

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Delquea

"	Delquea wrote:
	For me, AI will never replace actual artists. to me all I see is a reference generator XD one of my drawings was referenced from an AI generated image. made things easier since I was stumped on pose ideas..

This is literally the only reason why I have no issue with AI lol

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ RexSatou

My core thing is i dont want people thinking they should start marketing this lmao, past tipping and ko-fi, feels like a dangerous slope xD;

Use it for free, hobbyism, referencing? More to you. xD

RexSatou

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ OOOeyGoooey

Yea I share the same sentiment but

I've pretty much made peace with that pretty much being unavoidable when you factor in how many people are already doing it on other platforms like twitter, and yea etsy lol

at the same time the ones I've seen selling their AI stuff is usually the ones that don't really put much creativity into it because obviously all their seeing is dollar signs.

It pretty much boils down to people paying for something quick and usually sloppy and or low quality, or a recycled pic that they more than likely generated once before with different characters or something

Mosty boils down to,

Do you want Mcdonalds, or a meal from a dedicated chef that dedicates way more effort to his craft.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

Edited 1 month, 2 weeks ago by Owner

@ RexSatou

"	Do you want Mcdonalds, or a meal from a dedicated chef that dedicates way more effort to his craft.

Its definitely a little more then that with some making really high tier stuff with the refining, xD only a matter of time before it gets to being more, hell youtube is kinda already dealing with the ai tutorial influx and stuff, i really hope Ai dont start learning characters and stuff but its a little spooooky xD

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Delquea

Yeah, thats the danger i see too and its part of the thing yeah x3;

AI can learn though, theres a distinct possibility it could mimic styles, characters, and such, and if the work isnt perfect then all they have to do is edit it enough or use the tools the ai has for it

And if some news around like its been making full blown animations and ive seen some on IB as well, thats kinda scary.

If its made to use free and just as hobbyism i dont see a problem and tips for your work here and there maybe too, but i feel trying to turn it commission is an insult to digital artists

Delquea

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ OOOeyGoooey

Yeah that doesn't sit right with me at all. Its why I got annoyed when people tried to charge generated images as full on commissions rather than being given tips to push out various ideas that was suggested.

I know this one guy who only want tips and is happy to provide LoRa files to people who wanna generate art of their favorite cartoon characters. A friend of mine even provided said tip to get LoRa files of Lisa Loud and my husband been generating a lot of images of her for me to use as references XD

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ Delquea

Hah x3 of course its Lisa Loud~ But good good, bet youre enjoying the heck out of that xD

HattieTheHat

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

oh, it gets worse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u64cEgsZ41w

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

@ HattieTheHat

Jesus christ it really does.

Wow, thats wild, and youtube actually let this to happen too, thats craaaaaaazy. xD;

Taonas

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

Edited 1 month, 2 weeks ago by Owner

I have to admit, my view on AI art has softened. When I see some people spend days of work setting up complicated software and using third party libraries, carefully choreographing scenes by using addons that let you define poses, drawing reference images the AI can use, editing the results in photoshop; some people even going as far as doing all that work for each panel of a comic, I've been impressed. I've seen some people trying really hard to use AI to create beautiful things and I can only applaud the effort.

Underlying problems with sourcing of training material are not gone of course. And I agree that with those problems in mind, people profiting off of the skills of artists that did not volunteer their work to be stolen for training purposes is wrong. And I worry about the consequences for people that have made art their job.

OOOeyGoooey

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

Edited 1 month, 2 weeks ago by Owner

@ Taonas

Ive had some softening too, and i dont deny the effort they put in, maybe one day ill soften my views on it commishwise too but right now i just, as you said below with worry for people that made art thier job; Its a danger and a concern

I like AI still to some extent, it can create some pretty amazing things, but at the same time, it- well no, the humans training it are making it more dangerous, if the AI was pure hobbyism and maybe ko-fi tips i could handle that line, but some people think they could go commish wise with it, or trying to make comics from ai and fundraise it, absolutely ridiculous and a grave insult to me as an artist, thank god fully ai assisted commissions are not allowed here.

If you use AI ASSISTED stuff thats more fine too probs, Backgrounds can be rough, so an ai helping you could be nifty, even more if you reference the bg and assets and grow from it yourself

And thats why I dont want people to get to a "sit back and let the machine do it all for me" point, either

Its almost as if i dont dislike AI i dislike the people throwing dangerous/lazy ideas around, tbh

Sparkledooks

1 month, 2 weeks ago

link

I doubt IB's stance on the matter will change, but I am glad they try their best to enforce proper AI tagging (So I can blacklist it) and also prompt readouts in description.

Ironically, the prevalence of AI has made me appreciate the human element of art all that much more.

Breetails

3 weeks, 3 days ago

link

AI is a tool not a substitute for skill. It's as bad as tracing.

New Comment:

Move reply box to top ↑

Viewed:	312 times
Added:	1 month, 2 weeks ago 11 Mar 2024 21:39 CET

Inkbunny

Alright, im going to say something (AI Rant)

Help

Information

Policy & Legal