Curious about Blushing

by WhiteSky

These days I've seen a lot of art where artists draw blush on the noses instead of only the cheeks. When did this artistic choice happen? I'm really curious about that.

Because back then I was taught that blush only appears on cheeks and if the noses are red, it means you're drunk.

So I'm really curious why most artists these days draw blush on cheeks and noses even though none of them drank too much beer.

Viewed:	20 times
Added:	1 month, 1 week ago 30 Apr 2024 19:50 CEST

3 Comments on this Journal

Leave a Comment...

NeoPatamonX

1 month, 1 week ago

link

I never really thought about it; I suppose some folks found it cute and then that aesthetic just spreads because of the appeal, but you're absolutely right about the read of drunkenness

Or maybe all these fluffs are drunk!

Krayton

1 month, 1 week ago

link

They are drawing it on the nose and ears to account for the fact that is where there is no fur, or the fur is thinnest. I don't know if this is the real reason you see blushing not on the cheeks with furry art, but it's why I, personally, draw it there.

Munkers

1 month, 1 week ago

link

When I write, I have the ears heat up as a descriptor/metaphor for blushing since it wouldn't show through the fur, but I think being a little more conscious of fur covering in art is/isn't a bad thought xP

New Comment:

Move reply box to top ↑

Log in or create an account to comment.

Help

Information

Policy & Legal

All artwork and other content is copyright its respective owners.

Powered by Harmony 'Gravitation' Release 80.

Content Server: Virginia Cache - provided by Inkbunny Donors. Background: Blank Gray.

The Inkbunny web application, artwork, name and logo are copyright and trademark of their respective owners.