Inkbunny

MystBunny

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

Talking about Cream. It's okay to be attracted to Cream, of course, and granted you prefer an adult version of her, but it's still there, and there's nothing wrong with it. Every single study on the subject shows that repressing one's sexuality is more dangerous than making cub porn. If I were you, I'd start working on coming to terms with your own interests. It's the most healthy thing you can do.

Sangie

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

He loves the kid cream :P

Sangie

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

Can we not ruin the very useful word child porn or mean cartoons and fantasy?

Real children are harmed everyday of being raped, filmed, and shared.

Art harms exactly 0 children.

Good riddance. Don't let the doorknob fuck you in your ass on your way out.

Loisgriffin

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

@ Sangie

What crack type shit are you people on? 💀 THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT 💀💀💀💀💀

WildObsidian

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

Now imagine if cub/loli stuff was to be treated exactly like pedophilia,
good luck ever getting the police to intervene in a real child being molested because they are constantly stuck hunting down harmless people or former victims who are coping.

"Perhaps that is what you want" as many of us would say, because conflating cub and child porn helps pedophiles and hurts a large number of innocent people.

In my mind, condemning cub/loli art is the same as condemning violent video games.
You don't have to worry about people who sit in their room doing whatever to nobody, but you may have to worry about people who cannot tell the difference between fiction and reality.
"No that's totally different" is something I have heard people say a lot, but that is always the last thing they say. They don't follow up, because they don't have anything to say.

That being said, I highly condemn exposing people to cub art who weren't explicitly looking for it.

MystBunny

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

What are we on? They're called facts. Deny them all you want, but it's not going to help you or anyone else. I've mentioned the studies, but I've also spoken to three different experts on the subject, one of which I've developed a friendship with, so whenever I'm confused on a matter of sexuality, I have someone to clear it up for me. In many cases of sexual abuse of children, the attraction isn't even a factor, because it's not there to begin with. Most people who abuse children in that way, their porn history is either non-existent, or vanilla as fuck. One of the experts I spoke to believes one primary factor in these cases is sociopathy, and doesn't think it's a coincidence that one of the top five career choices of sociopaths is the Catholic priesthood.

Here's another article that explains how much impact ones sexual fantasies has on their actions.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/women-who-stray...

In particular, this bit pretty much sums it up.

"	Kahr, who, as part of his research examined over 23,000 sexual fantasies...

He goes on to describe how fantasies are contained within one's mind, and do not command they be enacted in reality. He offers examples of the frightening, violent, dangerous, and disturbing fantasies he has heard from doctors, therapists, priests, and nurses, fantasizing about what they'd like to do to, or with, their patients, but these fantasies were never enacted, and probably never would be for the overwhelming majority of healthcare professionals.

Loisgriffin

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

More like excuses

MystBunny

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

I didn't speak to three different experts looking for excuses, dude. If I needed excuses, I'd simply settle for what people told me here. With interests as taboo as these, I needed to know where I was correct, and where I wasn't. The only defense we have against this kind of hatred is knowledge, and I'm armed to the teeth with it.

Sangie

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

What's hilarious is I bet this loser will be back on InkBunny under an alt with a black icon and a random username, jerkin it to baby cream again lol.

So pathetic. Only people into child porn would call cub child porn. If they equate the two, they must enjoy both.

MystBunny

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

@ Sangie

Well, I don't want to make any assumptions, but I've certainly come across people who believe even aging up cub characters is evil and wrong. But I do hope he comes to terms with it. If he only knew how much happier I've seen people when they start accepting the parts of themselves so many people have told them is evil for so long.

Loisgriffin

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

@ Sangie

Keep telling yourself that

Sangie

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

Edited 6 months, 3 weeks ago by Owner

Every time you log into inkbunny to reply to me, it supports inkbunny and cub porn. Thank you <3

Also your favorite is a cub <3

Reizinho

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

It is not wrong, depending on the morals one has. For me, it is wrong when harmful, that's why I prefer the word "harmful", instead of "wrong", which is vaguer. Because of that, I'll continue making cub porn. There is no child porn in this site and there's more than just cub porn here. In fact, someone mentioned that "cub" is the second most blocked keyword in this site, losing only to "scat". So, many people who use Inkbunny are not into cub in the first place and use this site for other things. I really dislike Sonic porn, but I don't have a problem with anybody who likes it, provided they are nice to me. You can have a life and consume cub porn, such is my case. But may you have a good time away from this site, if that's what more attuned to the morals that you have. If you come back, I will not hold this against you. May you fare well.

Sangie

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

@ Reizinho

Haha I'll hold it against him. He should just delete his account and keep to his alt.

IdiotLol32

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

Let them fear you.

Loisgriffin

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

@ IdiotLol32

Someone else with common sense?

pasttense

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

Edited 6 months, 3 weeks ago by Owner

It seems you're juvenile, however careful posting a video entitled "i_want_this_man_hung.mp4", accompanied with someone's image as a thumbnail, online; I don't think there's much protection for such speech

pasttense

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

Edited 6 months, 3 weeks ago by Owner

Are you commissioning a murder? Think about what you're saying.

Loisgriffin

6 months ago

link

bro has no clue what a shit post is

pasttense

6 months ago

link

"i want this man hung" - a plain, unabashed request - accompanied with someone's image as a thumbnail? Seems like incitement to me

pasttense

6 months ago

link

Edited 6 months ago by Owner

So properly, whatever your intent (I've already suggested your intent is to be schooled), you're supposed to delete this upload and post something more moderate. If you've seen what I've written elsewhere, you'll know that I have no problem admitting a need to correct oneself at times into my thinking about the sort of art that's on this site, and I did you the courtesy of letting you know what you'd posted was risky, rather than compelling you to take it down (not that I could - maybe by filing a complaint, 'though). You can similarly be courteous, rather than a tool. I'm not going to force you to do one thing or the other, but I am letting you know how you appear to others

pasttense

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

Edited 6 months, 3 weeks ago by Owner

Although you and people like you might be impressed by your ability to imitate, your imitations are clueless and rudimentary, and everyone else just silently thinks you're an idiot

pasttense

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

The situation is that it offends you because you don't get it, so you take a negative stance and wait for someone to educate you, but we're not going to - you can go figure it out politely like regular people do, and until you do we'll continue to laugh at you while you run around proudly displaying your ignorance

pasttense

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

Edited 6 months, 3 weeks ago by Owner

live and let live, it's pretty simple; get a life.

Your mistake appears to lie right here:

"	There is literally nothing but child porn on this site.

There is literally no child porn on this site

Loisgriffin

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

The delusion is UNREAL 💀💀💀

pasttense

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

Edited 6 months, 3 weeks ago by Owner

Not quite - what is child pornography legislation intended to stop? Or, to put it another way, why criminalise child pornography? Simply, to prevent child sexual abuse

Loisgriffin

6 months ago

link

thx for proving my point

pasttense

6 months ago

link

You're the delusional one here, buddy; can you distinguish fiction from reality? you seem to be having difficulty. The statement "there is a car", in response to a drawing of a car (say), evaluates (for present purposes) to false - there is no car, just a drawing of one. There are no children here, only adults innocently communicating amongst themselves. There are no children being abused. There is no child porn here.

pasttense

6 months ago

link

The point is that when people say "child porn", they have something else in mind and you're exploiting some careless thinking in equivocating the two; it just doesn't bear under scrutiny

Loisgriffin

6 months ago

link

I had no clue!!!!! 😱😱😱

(btw its the fiction that your fantasizing about thats a disgrace to everything that humanity has ever lived for.)

pasttense

6 months ago

link

Thank you for your time 🙂

(I've no need to explain, so no problem 🙂)

Loisgriffin

6 months ago

link

stinky ass mf

pasttense

6 months ago

link

that's it - friendship over 😂

pasttense

6 months ago

link

Edited 6 months ago by Owner

I'll give you this, however - it was a bit naive of me to say "[there are] only adults innocently communicating amongst themselves [here]" - I'm not going to simply just vouch for everyone

pasttense

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

Ultimately, if you wish to include the sort of art found on this site under the definition of child pornography, then the definition becomes so broad as to become ineffective, as evidenced in the errors which can be drawn out in the reasoning popularly applied to child pornography once you note the distinction (a distinction which is already noted in law, however this line of argument hasn't yet fully played out in caselaw)

pasttense

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link

(that is, to everyone: know the law, and don't take my word for it, because it's not simple)

pasttense

6 months, 3 weeks ago

link