| " | CuriousFerret wrote: |
| To be honest I'm surprised we haven't resorted to blood shed at this point. It's horrible to think about but I no longer feel there is any redeeming qualities on the conservitive side of the argument. |
| " | CuriousFerret wrote: |
|
To be honest I'm surprised we haven't resorted to blood shed at this point. It's horrible to think about but I no longer feel there is any redeeming qualities on the conservitive side of the argument. And if liberals have finally wised up to the fact the right will never take responiblity for their actions or mistake we might just get to that point. As long conservitives put loyalty to their ideals over the rights of all Americans I will always view them as the enemy. They want the fight I say give it to them and let us be done with it. Words have failed us all. |
| " | RoareyRaccoon wrote: |
| Would you consider the collapse of the USA to be progress? |
| " | NikitaTheStag wrote: |
| Yup. Cause I come here to look at art and post my own. When you start calling me names instead of actually debating, or responding with 'okie doke' I can see it's not getting anywhere and there's no point for me to stick around while 7 of you keep filling up my inbox when I'm done talking. So yes. And anyone who continues to respond to this thread is also getting blocked. |
| " | HDMIport wrote: |
| never thought i'd see a political shitshow on a furry porn site lmao |
| " | greenmont wrote: |
|
Regarding policy, the major thing is the muslim immigration ban, which is a decision based on nation of origin and not on an individual threat assessment and therefore is generalizing based on race/nationality. Additionally since he often said during the campaign that he wanted to ban all muslim immigration, I interpret that as the intent of this policy, with the letter changed to skirt around the issue that a direct racial or religious based ban would be unconstitutional. Other than that, he and his father were previously sued in court, accused of instructing managers of buildings he owns not to rent to black tenants. Here's a link to an overview of that case: http://www.businessinsider.com/fbi-report-trump-housin... They settled this case for a large sum of money, on a condition that he would not be required to admit guilt. That was in the 70s so it's possible that whatever led him to manage his business in a racially biased way is gone from his character now. |
| " | greenmont wrote: |
|
All religions are equally incorrect. Basing any decision off of religion alone is wrong. Anyway, while plenty of revered biblical figures also engaged in violence and slavery and so forth, you're correct Jesus is not depicted as having done so. You wrote this: "Christianity could modernize not just from free society's influence, but from people asking questions about why government actions or scientific discoveries clash with the church's ideas." and that's exactly true. In an Islamist state, nobody will ever have the opportunity to ask those questions. That's why a free society would benefit those people. I won't make any claims about Islamic scripture or teaching because unlike the Bible I don't know very much about it. If I were going to make claims like that I'd want to cite specific text from that scripture or from some individual's teaching. I'm surprised to hear that there are sins in Islam for which one may be forgiven if they murder a non-islamic person, do you know where that's written? |
|
AxleFurret |
